| Bonding : Intramolecular Forces of Attraction |
1902-1916 - G.N. Lewis
![]() |
Described atoms with a cube model, explaining that the electron
in an atom were arranged in positions at the corners of a cube. This
model was based upon the following assumptions:
|
Lewis explained simple ionic compounds by assuming that atoms with less than four electrons in their outermost cube transferred those electrons to another atom which needed to gain that many electrons to fill its octet. Both atoms, then, would end up with an outer cube that was either completely filled or completely empty.e.g. Na loses one electron to Cl to form Na+ and Cl-.
![[Image]](nacl.gif)
It was later understood why Lewis's "octet" theory was valid. It requires eight electrons to fill the s (1) and p (3) orbitals in one shell which are the outermost orbitals in a shell. The outermost shell of an atom came to be known as the valence shell, and the electrons which reside in the valence shell are now known as valence electrons.
e.g. One Cl atom can share one of its outermost electrons with another Cl atom to form the diatomic molecule Cl2.
![[Image]](cl2.gif)
e.g. One O atom can share two of its outermost electrons with another O atom to form the diatomic molecule O2.
![[Image]](o2.gif)
Since atoms always seemed to share pairs of electrons when they formed bonds, Lewis changed his cube model with the eight electrons in the corners to a model with pairs of electrons. These models are known as Lewis Structures (or Lewis Dot Structures).e.g. The bonding of two Cl atoms for form Cl2 would now be written as:

These Lewis Structures models are still in use today. The only major difference between Lewis's system, and the system in use today is that the covalent bonds between the atoms today are represented by a line instead of two dots. Double bonds are represented by a double line and triple bonds are represented by triple lines.

Intramolecular Forces of Attraction - The forces of attraction that exist between bonds within a molecule.
|
2.20 |
* |
||||||||||||||||
|
0.98 |
1.57 |
2.04 |
2.55 |
3.04 |
3.44 |
3.98 |
* |
||||||||||
|
0.93 |
1.31 |
1.61 |
1.90 |
2.19 |
2.58 |
3.16 |
* |
||||||||||
|
0.82 |
1.00 |
1.36 |
1.54 |
1.63 |
1.66 |
1.55 |
1.83 |
1.88 |
1.91 |
1.90 |
1.65 |
1.81 |
2.01 |
2.18 |
2.55 |
2.96 |
* |
|
0.82 |
1.95 |
1.22 |
1.33 |
1.6 |
2.16 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.28 |
2.20 |
1.93 |
1.69 |
1.78 |
1.96 |
2.05 |
2.1 |
2.66 |
* |
|
0.79 |
0.89 |
1.1 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
2.36 |
1.9 |
2.2 |
2.20 |
2.28 |
2.54 |
2.00 |
2.04 |
2.33 |
2.02 |
2.0 |
2.2 |
* |
|
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds can be classified according to the difference in electronegativities of the atoms (EN). Bonds are:
When comparing bonds with the same atoms but with different oxidation states, we have to consider another factor besides the difference in the electronegativities of the atoms since this will be the same if the atoms are the same. As the oxidation number on an atom increase, its ability to draw electrons in a bond toward itself increases as well. For example, the electronegativity of an Mn atom in Mn2O7 (oxidation number of +7) is much greater than the electronegativity of an Mn atom in MnO (oxidation number of +2).
Nonpolar covalent - Covalent bond in which the electrons are shared equally.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Two general relationships between single, double and triple bondsPolar covalent - Covalent bond in which the electrons are NOT shared equally. The charged ends are called dipoles and are represented by the symbol
- BOND STRENGTH increases from single to double to triple
SINGLE < DOUBLE < TRIPLE
- BOND LENGTH decreases from single to double to triple
SINGLE > DOUBLE > TRIPLE
.
The end of the bond with the larger electronegativity is the slightly charged negative end. The end of the bond with the smaller electronegativity is the slightly charged positive end.
![]() |
In this H-Cl bond, for example, the bond is covalent since the |
Polar Versus Nonpolar MoleculesMolecules that contain polar covalent bonds may or may not be polar molecules. The polarity of a molecule is determined by measuring the dipole moment which is represented by the symbol . This depends on two factors:
If there are equal polar bonds that balance each other around the central atom, then the overall molecule will be NONPOLAR with no dipole moment, even though the bonds within the molecule may be polar.The degree of the overall separation of charge between the atoms in the bond The distance between the positive and negative poles
![]() |
In this molecule, CH4, the C atom has a higher EN than the surrounding H atoms. This makes the individual C-H bonds polar with a slightly negative charge on the C atom and a slightly positive charge on the H atoms. However, the polarities on these bonds balance each other out around the central C atom. The overall dipole moment of the molecule is therefore 0 and the molecule is nonpolar. |
If there are unequal polar bonds around the central atom, then the overall molecule will be POLAR with an a dipole moment.
| In the this molecule, CH3Cl, all of the bonds around the central C atom are not equal. The the Cl atom has a higher EN than the central C atom, so the electrons are more drawn toward the Cl atom. The H atoms have a lower EN than the central C atom and cannot balance out the large EN of the Cl atom. Therefore, the overall molecule has a dipole moment with a slightly negative charge on the Cl end and a slightly positive charge on the H ends, making the molecule polar. | ![]() |
![]() |
In this molecule, H2O, the two O-H bonds are polar but are equal to each other. However, the central O atom has a higher EN than the H atoms so the electrons are drawn toward the O atom. The O atom also has two pairs of nonbonding electrons, and combined the nonbonding electrons and the electrons drawn toward the O from the O-H bonds result in an overall dipole moment. Therefore, this molecule is polar. |
Check out more about bonding